Well it's been a decent getting-shit-together week, and I've played about 6K cash game hands, and am up about $150. I started a new database part way through and then also accidentally imported into the wrong database, so those hands are spread out over three databases, and I haven't re-imported everything yet so I don't have a picture of my stats this week, although they still look the same as always. I also played a whole bunch of sit and go tourneys, which I am up about $50 in, and which I think are a lot of fun and a good break from cash games. I think taking the time off from cash games was the right thing to do because when I got back into them again, I remembered just how good I am at this game!
It's been so difficult to play the past month, but this week I've gotten back into it, and whenever I've played I just owned everybody at the table. In my effort to play well, I've just forgotten how good at hand reading I am, and so this week, I just said screw how I play, I'm going to figure out what hands people have, and then just own (sorry, that should be spelled “pwn”) them with their own hands and my awesomeness, and that's basically what I did. And amazingly enough, my stats ended up fine, and of course I was playing “well”. In one exemplifying hand, I check-raised a guy twice, on the flop and turn, putting him in on the turn. He had a decent hand on the turn, but I still think he would have folded if I hadn't been picking on him during the sessions and if I hadn't made that kind of “fuck you” move of check-raising him twice.
http://www.pokerhand.org/?3261781
I did make a few screen recordings, but those were heads up matches between me and a friend and I don't think anybody else would find them particularly interesting because I didn't commentate too much.
My friend Erik came up with an idea for a small contest between us for us to at least play 50K hands during October, and I think that'd be good for me, and I'd like to do it, but after he thought of it, he realized he had a lot going on and now is not sure if he wants to go through with it. I'm hoping he does want to do it because I could use the motivation and I think it'd be good for both of us. I've learned a lot from him, and our HU matches are a lot of fun. Sometimes we get sick hands because we just know each other too well. Like in this hand, I told him he had to be value-betting light with a king or even AT or something, because he knew I'd shove any flush, trips, or two pair. He said he had hoped I thought it was a flush or nothing type of situation and look to bluff catch him, thus making his one pair of kings good when I called. I of course knew it was a light v-bet and not just pure air, but either way, I'm still throwing my hand away—but I think this hand is a good example of how we can 5th level one another fairly easily. I don't normally just fire randomly with crap, but I do occasionally just so he knows it's a possibility.
http://www.pokerhand.org/?3261889
So ya I've been back on track, and watching more videos. I watched the entire [Vital]Myth video series on CardRunners, most of which was very good and useful, but on some hands, I really think he chose very VERY specific spots that were SO specific that most people watching might (probably will) mis-construe the spot and the nature of the specific read. For example, in one hand, he had TT and the final board was 944-A-8 with no flush, and the guy bet on the river. Rather than call and bluff-catch which is generally the standard line there, he shoved because he surmised (based on his read and the betting) that the guy could almost never have a monster, and that a decent amount of his range was weak aces, which he would fold to a shove. So rather than picking the guy off and winning say 60-70% of the time, he figured shoving would win him the pot nearly 100% of the time. The problem is that most people who THINK they are as good as this guy at hand reading are not that good, so the villain's range in a similar spot DOES include big hands, and also most people in most games that MOST CardRunners members play in ARE going to call with a weak ace in that situations. So using that particular hand to communicate the concept of “sometimes it's okay to turn a bluff-catcher into a bluff, in the right spot” was not a good idea in my opinion, although I can't think off the top of my head what a better hand to show such a rare situation like that would be. I just think that trying to mimic that hand is going to really screw a lot of people over. But I suppose that's okay as far as my winrate is concerned...
Also, I have almost finished Negreanu's book, and Caro's book, both of which are excellent, although I think Negreanu's book is only REALLY good for his own section. Paul Wasicka and David William's sections are decent but not spectacular, and most of the other sections are kind of insults to decent players because they are such basic advice that it makes me think they guy's writing them are trying to hide their own stuff—which I guess I couldn't blame them too much for. I also just have an extreme dislike for Todd Brunson because in every single poker show I've ever seen him on, he's always been rude, self-centered, and inconsiderate to both the dealers and other players. Mike Caro's book is of course top-notch but I think a lot of the advice you have to have already learned on your own before you realize just how good of advice it is, so I feel I got a lot more out of it, because I could judge which parts were true gold versus being merely revolutionary.
Caro and Angel Largay both understand how much of the live casino poker game is comprised of attitude and image and getting to know your opponents in order to get action that other good players would not get. If you don't appear to be having fun at the table, the guys who are there for fun won't give you action. I've even seen a regular at the MGM 2-5 game get super pissed and leave because the big fish at the table showed an overpair to the board and folded, whereas 35 minutes earlier he had called my all in with ace high (post flop).
That reg just didn't understand this; he didn't get that he looked like he was out to steal your money, which naturally makes people defensive, whereas I look like I'm there to have fun, and that's because I DO try to have fun and chat with the people at the table and try to understand why they are there and what their emotional reasons for playing poker are. When they've asked if I do this for a living or if I make money at the game, I am honest in my response “I sure as hell try!” but that response as implies a bit of camaraderie, and endears me to people more than a simple stern “yes” because it shows we're all in the game together.
I've also made a lot of friends and connections at the poker table by being friendly, and I don't just view bad players as fish. I mean, if I guy makes 200K a year and sits at a 2-5 game for fun just to learn about poker and gamble and drink and have fun, and you're some card shark schmuck barely scraping by, trying to take his money, who's the real fish here?? Honestly.
The poker table is comprised not of sharks and fish and players in between, but of people who are there to play for different reasons, and not understanding that costs a lot of decent players a lot of money that they could make if they were just a little kinder and more empathetic towards their customers.
Incidentally, being this way allows me to play a wider range of hands because I get the calls I need to make them profitable, so I get a looser image, which feeds into the “having fun” image. Whereas the “for the money” players can't play as loose because they won't get the calls they need to make it profitable which means they look tighter as well, which feeds into their “only play when I have the edge” image that most fish don't like to play against.
I also played in a home game, where I swear I played 50/25/2 in this 6-handed home game and still won $85 with blinds of 10/25 cents. Being friendly as stated above, and being able to tell exactly where the bad AND the good players were (because I am some kind of poker GOD) allowed me to get the calls and folds I wanted 90+ percent of the time. It was a lot of fun,a nd good to get outside and good to play some live poker for a change. I thoroughly enjoyed it, and also ran into somebody I went to high school with. And I found out that the friend he came with, whom I had played with previously and think is a great guy, is the cousin of a guy who I really detested in school.
So anyway, with that home game, and my not losing my ass online again, and rake back, I'm up just about $300 for the week, which isn't much certainly, but it's par for the course given the time I've put in, and it FEELS good to be back on track, which I think will help me from now on.
I'll stop blabbering, and have an update next week, as well as have fixed my databases. And hopefully I'll be able to say that I am in the middle of a 50K hands challenge....